Apple's App Police Ban Pulitzer Prize Winning Cartoonist for Being Satirical
There’s no denying that Apple’s iTunes and App Store revolutionized the
fields of online media sales and smartphone application delivery,
respectively. However, for all the company’s success, of late
it has a baffling track record of trying to police
the morality of the apps that go into its app
Initially Apple rejected any apps that overlapped with its functionality, any mature apps, and any other controversial app. Occasionally a strange one (like “Baby Shaker”) would slip through, but generally all these kinds of apps were prohibited.
Recently, Apple promised to improve the process facing complaints from frustrated developers. And there are signs of that improvement — Opera Mini, a rival browser, was just approved for the iPhone and numerous adult apps of violent cartoonish nature have been approved. On the other hand, Apple still is banning mature apps of a sexual nature.
Particularly baffling, though, was the recent rejection of Mark Fiore’s iPhone app. Fiore this year received the distinction of becoming the first online-only journalist to win the Pulitzer prize. Fiore used to make cartoons for print newspapers, but today runs his own syndication business dealing exclusively with flash cartoons. He does about 8 cartoons a month, selling for around $300 per site, syndicated to multiple sites, including his main outlet, the SFGate, the website for the San Francisco Chronicle.
Looking to use the latest smartphone technology to grab more fans Fiore crafted a humorous iPhone app with highlights of his award winning, ground-breaking work. He describes, “I think the iPads and anything iPod to iPhone — to maybe a product not made by Apple — will be good or could be good for distributing this kind of thing.”
But there was one tiny problem. Apple’s developer agreement forbids content that “ridicules public figures”. Apple elaborates in its iPhone Developer Program License Agreement, “Apple’s reasonable judgement may be found objectionable, for example, materials that may be considered obscene, pornographic, or defamatory.”
On December 21, 2009 Mr. Fiore received the following email from Apple:
Dear Mr. Fiore,
Thank you for submitting NewsToons to the App Store. We’ve reviewed NewsToons and determined that we cannot post this version of your iPhone application to the App Store because it contains content that ridicules public figures and is in violation of Section 3.3.14 from the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement which states:
“Applications may be rejected if they contain content or materials of any kind (text, graphics, images, photographs, sounds, etc.) that in Apple’s reasonable judgement may be found objectionable, for example, materials that may be considered obscene, pornographic, or defamatory.” Examples of such content have been attached for your reference.
If you believe that you can make the necessary changes so that NewsToons does not violate the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement, we encourage you to do so and resubmit it for review.
iPhone Developer Program
Apple found the cartoon of the White
House gate crashers interrupting an Obama speech (among the
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoons) to be offensive. It attached
that screen grab and several others, including a reference to
Boy, and various political issues.
Fiore remains hopeful that his app will eventually get let in. Fellow cartoonists Tom Richmondand Daryl Cagle , were initially rejected 2 by Apple, only before eventually being allowed in 2. Those turnarounds took months.
Fiore remains hopeful that Apple will eventually let him in. He states, “They seem so much more innovative and smarter than that.”
_© 2009, DailyTech.’